Adelos, Inc. v. Halliburton Company et al

Filing 31

ORDER granting 28 John Roddy Pace's Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 10/19/2016. (ASG, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION CV 16-119-M-DLC ADELOS, INC., Plaintiff, ORDER vs. HALLIBURTON COMPANY; HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC.; OPTIPHASE, INC.; SENSORTRAN, INC.; and PINNACLE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., FILED OCT 19 2016 Cltrlt, U.S District Court Clltl1ct Of Montan• Missoul8 Defendants. Defendants Halliburton Company and Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., move for the admission of John Roddy Pace to practice before this Court in this case with Bradley J. Luck, Emma L. Mediak, and Kathleen L. DeSoto to act as local counsel. The application appears to be in order. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' motion to admit John Roddy Pace pro hac vice (Doc. 28) is GRANTED on the condition that Mr. Pace does his own work. This means that he must: (1) do his own writing; (2) sign his own pleadings, motions, and briefs; and (3) appear and participate personally. Counsel shall take steps to register in the Court's electronic filing system 1 (CM-ECF). Further information is available on the Court's website, www.mtd.uscourts.gov, or from the Clerk's Office. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is subject to withdrawal unless Mr. Pace within fifteen (15) days of this Order, file a separate pleading acknowledging his admission under the terms set forth above. . ~ Dated this li_ day of October, 2016. Dana L. Christensen, Chief Judge United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?