Carnell v. Brown et al
Filing
9
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. This dismissal counts as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(g) and any appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 9/27/2017. (APP) Copy mailed to Plaintiff
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
MISSOULA DIVISION
CV 17-22-M-DLC-JCL
DOUGLAS JAMES CARNELL,
Plaintiff,
ORDER
vs.
BRANDY HOUSER, et al.,
Defendants.
United States Magistrate Judge Jeremiah C. Lynch entered his Findings and
Recommendations in this case on August 28, 2017, recommending that this action
be dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff Douglas James Camell
("Camell") failed to timely object to the findings and recommendations, and so
waived the right to de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). The
Court will therefore review the record for clear error. McDonnell Douglas Corp.
v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981).
After reviewing the record and finding no clear error,
IT IS ORDERED that Judge Lynch's Findings and Recommendations (Doc.
8) is ADOPTED IN FULL.
(1)
This matter is DISMISSED.
-1-
(2)
The Clerk of Court is directed to close this matter and enter
judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
(3)
The Clerk of Court is directed to have the docket reflect that this
dismissal counts as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) based
upon Camell' s failure to state a claim.
(4)
The Clerk of Court is directed to have the docket reflect that the
Court certifies pursuant to Rule 24(a)(3)(A) of the Federal Rules of
Appellate Procedure that any appeal of this decision would not be
taken in good faith. The record makes plain the instant Complaint
lacks arguable substance in law or fact.
DATED this
2.1-~ay of September,
Dana L. Christensen, Chief Judge
United States District Court
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?