Crow Indian Tribe et al v. United States of America et al

Filing 180

ORDER granting (179) Motion to Clarify in case 9:17-cv-00089-DLC. The second paragraph of Section II of the Court's Order dated May 14, 2018 is revised to read: The Court finds that in an effort to expedite the APA and ESA claims identified in Footnote 2 prior to a potential fall hunting season, bifurcating and staying other claims is appropriate. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 5/17/2018. Associated Cases: 9:17-cv-00089-DLC et al. (ASG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION FILED MAY 1 7 2018 ('.le~. U Courts .s D1~tnct Of Montana Missoula Division CROW INDIAN TRIBE; et al., CV 17-89-M-DLC Plaintiffs, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; et al., Federal Defendants. (Consolidated with Case Nos. CV 17-117-M-DLC ' CV 17-118-M-DLC ' CV 17-119-M-DLC ' CV 17-123-M-DLC and CV 18-16-M-DLC) and ORDER STATE OF WYOMING; et al., Defendant-Intervenors. Before the Court is Plaintiff Aland's Motion to Clarify Court's Order Dated May 14, 2018. (Doc. 179.) Plaintiff Aland requests that the Court remove the phrase "claims that are non-dispositive on these main issues" in the second paragraph of Section II of the Order. (Doc. 179 at 1.) Federal Defendants, Defendant-Intervenors, and other parties take no position with regard to this Motion. Finding good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion (Doc. 179) is GRANTED. The second paragraph of Section II of the Court's Order dated May 14, 2018 is revised to read: -1- The Court finds that in an effort to expedite the AP A and ESA claims identified in Footnote 2 prior to a potential fall hunting season, bifurcating and staying other claims is appropriate. DATED this li-4taay of May, 2018. Dana L. Christensen, Chief Judge United States District Court -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?