Crow Indian Tribe et al v. United States of America et al
Filing
180
ORDER granting (179) Motion to Clarify in case 9:17-cv-00089-DLC. The second paragraph of Section II of the Court's Order dated May 14, 2018 is revised to read: The Court finds that in an effort to expedite the APA and ESA claims identified in Footnote 2 prior to a potential fall hunting season, bifurcating and staying other claims is appropriate. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 5/17/2018. Associated Cases: 9:17-cv-00089-DLC et al. (ASG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
MISSOULA DIVISION
FILED
MAY 1 7 2018
('.le~. U Courts
.s
D1~tnct Of Montana
Missoula Division
CROW INDIAN TRIBE; et al.,
CV 17-89-M-DLC
Plaintiffs,
vs.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; et al.,
Federal Defendants.
(Consolidated with Case Nos.
CV 17-117-M-DLC
'
CV 17-118-M-DLC
'
CV 17-119-M-DLC
'
CV 17-123-M-DLC
and CV 18-16-M-DLC)
and
ORDER
STATE OF WYOMING; et al.,
Defendant-Intervenors.
Before the Court is Plaintiff Aland's Motion to Clarify Court's Order Dated
May 14, 2018. (Doc. 179.) Plaintiff Aland requests that the Court remove the
phrase "claims that are non-dispositive on these main issues" in the second
paragraph of Section II of the Order. (Doc. 179 at 1.) Federal Defendants,
Defendant-Intervenors, and other parties take no position with regard to this
Motion. Finding good cause appearing,
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion (Doc. 179) is GRANTED. The second
paragraph of Section II of the Court's Order dated May 14, 2018 is revised to read:
-1-
The Court finds that in an effort to expedite the AP A and ESA claims
identified in Footnote 2 prior to a potential fall hunting season, bifurcating
and staying other claims is appropriate.
DATED this li-4taay of May, 2018.
Dana L. Christensen, Chief Judge
United States District Court
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?