Crow Indian Tribe et al v. United States of America et al

Filing 233

ORDER granting (232) Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Beth Baldwin) in case 9:17-cv-00089-DLC. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 8/20/2018. Associated Cases: 9:17-cv-00089-DLC et al. (ASG)

Download PDF
FILED AUG 2 0 2018 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION l:J.S District Coun D1stnct_Of MontaneĀ· Cler!<. Missoula CROW INDIAN TRIBE; et al., CV 17-89-M-DLC Plaintiffs, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; et al., Federal Defendants. (Consolidated with Case Nos. CV 17-117-M-DLC ' CV 17-118-M-DLC ' CV 17-119-M-DLC ' CV 17-123-M-DLC and CV 18-16--M-DLC) and ORDER STATE OF WYOMING; et al., Defendant-Intervenors. Plaintiffs Sierra Club, Center for Biological Diversity, and National Parks Conservation Association and Northern Cheyenne Tribe move for the admission of Beth Baldwin to practice before this Court in this case with Timothy J. Preso, of Earthjustice, to act as local counsel. The application appears to be in order. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs' motion to admit Beth Baldwin pro hac vice (Doc. 232) is GRANTED on the condition that Ms. Baldwin does her own work. This means that she must: (1) do her own writing; (2) sign -1- her own pleadings, motions, and briefs; and (3) appear and participate personally. Counsel shall take steps to register in the Court's electronic filing system (CMECF). Further information is available on the Court's website, www.mtd.uscourts.gov, or from the Clerk's Office. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is subject to withdrawal unless Ms. Baldwin within fifteen (15) days of this Order, files a separate pleading acknowledging her admission under the terms set forth above. DATED this i.o""'day of August, 2018. Dana L. Christensen, Chief Judge United States District Court -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?