Crow Indian Tribe et al v. United States of America et al
Filing
70
ORDER granting (54) Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - Michael Jean for NRA of America. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 12/28/2017. Served via CM/ECF upon local counsel Robert Bell. Associated Cases: 9:17-cv-00089-DLC, 9:17-cv-00117-DLC, 9:17-cv-00118-DLC, 9:17-cv-00119-DLC, 9:17-cv-00123-DLC (ASG)
FILED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
MISSOULA DIVISION
DEC 2 8 2017
Clerk, U. S Oistrid Court
District Of Montana
Missoula
CROW INDIAN TRIBE; et al.,
CV 17-89-M-DLC
Plaintiffs,
vs.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; et al.,
(Consolidated with Case Nos.
CV 17-117-M-DLC
'
CV 17-118-M-DLC
'
CV 17-119-M-DLC
'
and CV 17-123-M-DLC)
Federal-Defendants,
and
STATE OF WYOMING; STATE OF
IDAHO; SAFARI CLUB
INTERNATIONAL and NATIONAL
RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA,
Defendant-Intervenors.
Defendant-Intervenor National Rifle Association of America moves for the
admission of Michael T. Jean to practice before this Court in this case with Robert
T. Bell to act as local counsel. The application appears to be in order.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant-Intervenor National Rifle
Association of America's motion to admit Michael T. Jean pro hac vice (Doc. 54)
is GRANTED on the condition that Mr. Jean does his own work. This means that
he must: (1) do his own writing; (2) sign his own pleadings, motions, and briefs;
-1-
and (3) appear and participate personally. Counsel shall take steps to register in
the Court's electronic filing system (CM-ECF). Further information is available
on the Court's website, www.mtd.uscourts.gov, or from the Clerk's Office.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is subject to withdrawal unless
Mr. Jean within fifteen (15) days of this Order, files a separate pleading
acknowledging his admission under the terms set forth above.
DATED this 28th day of December, 2017.
Dana L. Christensen, Chief )istrict Judge
United States District Court
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?