Crow Indian Tribe et al v. United States of America et al

Filing 99

ORDER granting Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of D. David DeWald. Acknowledgment of PHV Order due within fifteen days of this Order. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 1/19/2018. Associated Cases: 9:17-cv-00089-DLC, 9:17-cv-00117-DLC, 9:17-cv-00118-DLC, 9:17-cv-00119-DLC, 9:17-cv-00123-DLC (NOS)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION FILED JAN 19 2018 ~ยท l!.S Oiatrid Court lstrid.Of Montana Missoula CROW INDIAN TRIBE; et al., CV 17-89-M-DLC Plaintiffs, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; et al., (Consolidated with Case Nos. CV 17-117-M-DLC ' CV 17-118-M-DLC, CV 17-119-M-DLC ' and CV 17-123-M-DLC) Defendants. ORDER and STATE OF WYOMING; STATE OF IDAHO; SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL and NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, Defendant-Intervenors. Defendant-Intervenor State of Wyoming moves for the admission ofD. David De Wald to practice before this Court in this case with Adrian A. Miller to act as local counsel. The application appears to be in order. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant-Intervenor State of Wyoming's motion to admit D. David De Wald pro hac vice (Doc. 95) is GRANTED on the condition that Mr. De Wald does his own work. This means that he must: (1) do his own writing; (2) sign his own pleadings, motions, and -1- briefs; and (3) appear and participate personally. Counsel shall take steps to register in the Court's electronic filing system (CM-ECF). Further information is available on the Court' s website, www.mtd.uscourts.gov, or from the Clerk's Office. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is subject to withdrawal unless Mr. De Wald within fifteen (15) days of this Order, files a separate pleading acknowledging his admission under the terms set forth above. ~ay of January, 2018. DATED this l.i_ Dana L. Christensen, Chief Judge United States District Court -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?