Crow Indian Tribe et al v. United States of America et al
Filing
99
ORDER granting Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of D. David DeWald. Acknowledgment of PHV Order due within fifteen days of this Order. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 1/19/2018. Associated Cases: 9:17-cv-00089-DLC, 9:17-cv-00117-DLC, 9:17-cv-00118-DLC, 9:17-cv-00119-DLC, 9:17-cv-00123-DLC (NOS)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
MISSOULA DIVISION
FILED
JAN 19 2018
~ยท l!.S Oiatrid Court
lstrid.Of Montana
Missoula
CROW INDIAN TRIBE; et al.,
CV 17-89-M-DLC
Plaintiffs,
vs.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; et al.,
(Consolidated with Case Nos.
CV 17-117-M-DLC
'
CV 17-118-M-DLC,
CV 17-119-M-DLC
'
and CV 17-123-M-DLC)
Defendants.
ORDER
and
STATE OF WYOMING; STATE OF
IDAHO; SAFARI CLUB
INTERNATIONAL and NATIONAL
RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA,
Defendant-Intervenors.
Defendant-Intervenor State of Wyoming moves for the admission ofD.
David De Wald to practice before this Court in this case with Adrian A. Miller to
act as local counsel.
The application appears to be in order.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant-Intervenor State of
Wyoming's motion to admit D. David De Wald pro hac vice (Doc. 95) is
GRANTED on the condition that Mr. De Wald does his own work.
This means
that he must: (1) do his own writing; (2) sign his own pleadings, motions, and
-1-
briefs; and (3) appear and participate personally.
Counsel shall take steps to
register in the Court's electronic filing system (CM-ECF).
Further information is
available on the Court' s website, www.mtd.uscourts.gov, or from the Clerk's
Office.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is subject to withdrawal unless
Mr. De Wald within fifteen (15) days of this Order, files a separate pleading
acknowledging his admission under the terms set forth above.
~ay of January, 2018.
DATED this l.i_
Dana L. Christensen, Chief Judge
United States District Court
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?