Williams v. Republic Services, Inc. et al

Filing 16

ORDER granting 12 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Ursula A. Kienbaum. Acknowledgment of PHV Order due by 9/26/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremiah C. Lynch on 9/11/2017. (APP)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS, FILED S£p ff 2017 Clet1(, US . District ODistrict C fM oun Missou1~ntana CV 17-90-M-DLC-JCL Plaintiff, ORDER vs. REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC., an, Arizona Corporation, REPUBLIC SERVICES OF MONTANA, owned by Republic Services, Inc. Defendants. Defendants Republic Services, Inc. and Allied Waste Services of North Allied Waste Services of North America, LLC (incorrectly identified as Republic Services of Montana), move for the admission of Ursula A. Kienbaum to practice before this Court in this case with Raul Chacon, Jr. to act as local counsel. Ms. Kienbaum's application appears to be in order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' motion to admit Ms. Kienbaum pro hac vice is GRANTED on the condition that Ms. Kienbaum shall do her own work. This means that Ms. Kienbaum must do her own writing, sign her own pleadings, motions, and briefs, and appear and participate personally. Counsel shall take steps to register in the Court's electronic filing system ("CMECF"). Further information is available on the Court's website, www.mtd.uscourts.gov, or from the Clerk's Office. Ms. Kienbaum may move for the admission pro hac vice of one (1) associate of her firm. Such associate, if duly admitted, shall be authorized to participate in this case on the same terms and conditions as Ms. Kienbaum. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is subject to withdrawal unless Ms. Kienbaum, within fifteen (15) days of the date of this Order, files a pleading acknowledging her admission under the terms set forth above. iah C. Lynch U ited States Magistrate Judge r

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?