Humane Society of The United States et al v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service et al

Filing 15

ORDER granting 13 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - Attorney Erik Edward Petersen for State of Wyoming. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 11/13/2017. (ASG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION FILED NOV 13 2017 Clerk, U.S District Court District Of Montana Missoula THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES and THE FUND FOR ANIMALS, CV 17-117-M-DLC ORDER Plaintiffs, vs. U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, an agency of the Department of the Interior; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR; RYAN ZINKE, Secretary of the Interior; GREG SHEEHAN, Acting Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; and JIM KURTH, Deputy Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Defendants. and STATE OF WYOMING, Defendant-Intervenor. Defendant-Intervenor State of Wyoming moves for the admission of Erik E. Petersen to practice before this Court in this case with Adrian Miller to act as local counsel. The application appears to be in order. -1- Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant-Intervenor's motion to admit Erik E. Petersen pro hac vice (Doc. 13) is GRANTED on the condition that Mr. Petersen does his own work. This means that he must: (1) do his own writing; (2) sign his own pleadings, motions, and briefs; and (3) appear and participate personally. Counsel shall take steps to register in the Court's electronic filing system (CM-ECF). Further information is available on the Court's website,, or from the Clerk's Office. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is subject to withdrawal unless Mr. Petersen within fifteen (15) days of this Order, files a separate pleading acknowledging his admission under the terms set forth above. DATED this \ 3+k day of November, 2017. Dana L. Christensen, Chief Judge United States District Court -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?