Native Ecosystems Council et al v. Marten et al
Filing
26
ORDER granting 23 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Lawson E. Fite for Defendant-Intervenors Meagher County, Montana Logging Association, and Montana Wood Products Association. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is subject to withdrawal unless Mr. Fite, within 15 days of the date of this Order, files a notice acknowledging his admission. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 5/30/2018. (NOS)
FILED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRJCT OF MONTANA
MISSOULA DIVISION
NAY 3 o2018
9erk.u
°M~trict o(~ Courts
ISSou/a 0·0.ntana
1v1sion
CV 17-153-M-DWM
NATIVE ECOSYSTEMS COUNCIL,
et al.,
Plaintiff,
ORDER
vs.
LEANNE MARTEN, et al.,
Defendants,
and
MONTANA WOOD PRODUCTS
ASSOCIATION, a Montana
Corporation, MONTANA LOGGING
ASSOCIATION, a Montana
Corporation, and MEAGHER
COUNTY, a political subdivision of
the State of Montana,
Defendant-Intervenors.
Defendant-Intervenors Montana Wood Products Association, Montana
Logging Association, and Meagher County move for the admission of Lawson E.
Fite to practice before this Court in this case with Trent N. Baker to act as local
counsel. Mr. Fite's application appears to be in order.
1
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to admit Lawson E. Fite pro
hac vice (Doc. 23) is GRANTED on the condition that Mr. Fite shall do his own
work. This means that Mr. Fite must do his own writing; sign his own pleadings,
motions, and briefs; and appear and participate personally. Counsel shall take
steps to register in the Court's electronic filing system ("CM-ECF"). Further
information is available on the Court's website, www.mtd.uscourts.gov, or from
the Clerk's Office.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is subject to withdrawal unless
Mr. Fite, within fifteen (15) days of the date of this Order, files a notice
acknowledging his admission under the terms set forth above .
.
--2
y
DATED this .;;0 day of May, 2018.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?