Larson v. Granite State Insurance Company et al
Filing
12
ORDER granting 10 Motion for Recusal. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 8/21/2018. (Copy to Chief Judge Christensen's chambers for reassignment.) (NOS)
FILED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
MISSOULA DIVISION
AUG 21 2018
Clerk, US ,
Di~trict Of MCourts
M1ssou1 D . on~ana
a
1
111s1on
CLAUDIA J. LARSON,
CV 18-98-M-DWM
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v.
GRANITE STATE INSURANCE
COMP ANY, a New Hampshire
Corporation, and JOHN DOES,
NOS. 1AND2,
Defendants.
Defendant Granite State Insurance Company moves for recusal and
reassignment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455. The motion is unopposed.
Section 455(b )(5)(iv) provides that a federal judicial officer shall recuse
himself from any proceeding in which "a person within the third degree of
relationship to [him], or the spouse of such a person ... [i]s to the judge's
knowledge likely to be a material witness in the proceeding." See also Mangini v.
United States, 314 F.3d 1158, 1161-62 (9th Cir. 2003).
The attorney who represented Plaintiff Claudia Larson in the underlying
personal injury action may be a material witness in this case, in which Larson has
alleged that Granite State violated Montana's Unfair Trade Practices Act, Montana
Code Annotated§§ 33-18-201 et seq. The attorney is the spouse of "a person
within the third degree of relationship to" the undersigned. Consequently, 28
U.S.C. § 455(b )(5)(iv) requires recusal and reassignment of this matter to another
judge of the District. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the motion (Doc. 10) is GRANTED. Pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 455(b )(5)(iv), the undersigned hereby recuses himself from the abovecaptioned matter. The Clerk of Court is directed to provide a copy of this order to
Chief United States District Court Judge Dana L. Christensen upon filing, so that
Judge Christensen may re-assign the matter in accordance with Standing Order
DLC-40 or as otherwise appropriate.
DATED this
~f~ay of ,,.,......_
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?