Maloof v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 21

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for fees in the amount of $5,498.42 and costs in the amount of $17.25 under the Equal Access to Justice Act, (Doc. 18), is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 9/9/2021. (NOS)

Download PDF
Case 9:20-cv-00116-DWM Document 21 Filed 09/09/21 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION CV 20-116-M-DWM DEBORAH DEE MALOOF, Plaintiff, ORDER vs. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Plaintiff has filed a motion for attorney fees and costs pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. (Doc. 18.) Plaintiff seeks attorney fees in the amount of $5,498.42 and seeks costs in the amount of $17.25. The Commissioner has indicated it does not oppose this motion. (Doc. 20.) Fees and costs may be awarded under the Equal Access to Justice Act when the plaintiff is the prevailing party and the United States’ position was not substantially justified. See Meier v. Colvin^ 111 F.3d 867, 870 (9th Cir. 2013). Here, Plaintiff was granted relief,(Doc. 16), and the order granting such relief was not appealed. Thus, Plaintiff is a prevailing party. Additionally, it is the govemmenfs burden to show that its position was substantially justified, Meier, 111 F.3d at 870, and the Commissioner makes no attempt at substantial 1 Case 9:20-cv-00116-DWM Document 21 Filed 09/09/21 Page 2 of 3 justification here,(Doc. 20 at 2.) Thus, Plaintiff may be awarded fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. Finally, “[i]t is the district court’s prerogative to determine whether a fee award is reasonable. Schulz V. Saul 798 F. App’x 142, 142(9th Cir. 2020). Here, Plaintiff has provided an accounting of fees,(Doc. 19-1), and that accounting appears facially reasonable. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion for fees in the amount of $5,498.42 and costs in the amount of$17.25 under the Equal Access to Justice Act,(Doc. 18), is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if, after receiving the Court’s Equal Access to Justice Act fee order, the Commissioner(1) determines upon effectuation of the Court’s fee order that Plaintiff does not owe a debt that is subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program,(2) agrees to waive the requirements of the Anti-Assignment Act, and (3) is provided a valid assignment of fees executed by Plaintiff, the fees will be made payable to Plaintiff s attorney and mailed to Plaintiffs attorney’s office as follows: Rasmusson Law Offices, PLLC P.O. Box 7825 701 N. Washington Missoula, MT 59807 However, if there is a debt owed under the Treasury Offset Program, the Commissioner cannot agree to waive the requirements of the Anti-Assignment Act, 2 Case 9:20-cv-00116-DWM Document 21 Filed 09/09/21 Page 3 of 3 and check for any remaining Equal Access to Justice Act fees after offset will be paid by a check made out to Plaintiff but delivered to Plaintiffs attorney’s office at the address stated above. DATED this day of September, 2021. (/ Donald Molloy, District Judge United Stated District Court 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?