Godfrey v. Salmonson
APPEAL ORDER: Petitioners motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. 2) is denied as moot. No further filings will be accepted in this closed case. DENIED. (HEG)
Case: 20-73112, 11/19/2020, ID: 11899923, DktEntry: 3, Page 1 of 2
Case 9:20-cv-00122-DWM Document 7 Filed 11/20/20 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NOV 19 2020
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
In re: TRACEY GODFREY.
D.C. No. 9:20-cv-00122-DWM
District of Montana,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA,
Real Party in Interest.
Before: CLIFTON, IKUTA, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner has not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of the
court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. U.S.
Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977); see also Demos v. U.S. Dist. Court, 925
F.2d 1160, 1161 (9th Cir. 1991) (“[T]his court lacks jurisdiction to issue a writ of
mandamus to a state court.”). Accordingly, the petition is denied.
Petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. 2) is
denied as moot.
Case: 20-73112, 11/19/2020, ID: 11899923, DktEntry: 3, Page 2 of 2
Case 9:20-cv-00122-DWM Document 7 Filed 11/20/20 Page 2 of 2
No further filings will be accepted in this closed case.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?