Alliance for the Wild Rockies et al v. United States Forest Service et al

Filing 4

ORDER granting 3 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - Claudia Newman for Plaintiffs. Acknowledgment of PHV Order due by 9/22/2021. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 9/7/2021. Served on Local Counsel for Plaintiffs via CM/ECF. (ASG)

Download PDF
Case 9:21-cv-00084-DLC Document 4 Filed 09/07/21 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES, NATIVE ECOSYSTEMS COUNCIL, CV 21–84–M–DLC Plaintiffs, ORDER vs. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE; RANDY MOORE, Chief of the Forest Service; MARY ERICKSON, Forest Supervisor for the Custer Gallatin National Forest; and LEANNE MARTEN, Regional Forester for Region 1 for the U.S. Forest Service, Defendants. Plaintiffs, by and through their attorney Laura King, moves this Court for the admission of Claudia Newman pro hac vice in the above-captioned matter. (Doc. 3.) It appears Ms. King intends to act as local counsel. (Id.) Ms. Newman’s application appears to be in order. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Ms. Newman’s motion to appear pro hac vice (Doc. 3) is GRANTED on the condition that she does her own work. This means that Ms. Newman must: (1) do her own writing; (2) sign her own pleadings, 1 Case 9:21-cv-00084-DLC Document 4 Filed 09/07/21 Page 2 of 2 motions, and briefs; and (3) appear and participate personally. Ms. Newman shall take steps to register in the Court’s electronic filing system (CM-ECF). Further information is available on the Court’s website, www.mtd.uscourts.gov, or from the Clerk’s Office. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is subject to withdrawal unless Ms. Newman files a separate pleading acknowledging her admission under the terms set forth above within fifteen (15) days of this Order. DATED this 7th day of September, 2021. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?