Spiekermeier v. Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al

Filing 3

ORDER granting 2 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. NOTE: Instructions to request Montana CM/ECF registration through PACER are found here. Acknowledgment of PHV Order due by 10/4/2022. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 9/19/2022. (ASG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION LAWRENCE J. SPIEKERMEIER, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, CV 22–158–M–DLC ORDER vs. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.; PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA, LLC; AND PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC., Defendants. Plaintiff, by and through his attorney Dwight J. Schulte of the Schulte Law Firm, move for the admission of Alexander G. Cabeceiras to practice before this Court in the above-captioned matter. (Doc. 2.) Mr. Schulte represents that he intends to act as local counsel. (Id. at 2.) The Court has reviewed Mr. Cabeceiras’ affidavit (Doc. 2-1) which complies with the District of Montana’s Local Rules governing the admission of counsel pro hac vice and otherwise appears to be in order. L.R. 83.1(d). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the motion (Doc. 2) is GRANTED on the condition that Mr. Cabeceiras do his own work. This means that he must: (1) do his own writing; (2) sign his own pleadings, motions, and briefs; and (3) appear and participate personally. Mr. Cabeceiras shall take steps to register in the -1- Court’s electronic filing system (“CM-ECF”). Further information is available on the Court’s website, www.mtd.uscourts.gov, or from the Clerk’s Office. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is subject to withdrawal unless Mr. Cabeceiras, within fifteen (15) days of the date of this Order, files a pleading acknowledging his admission under the terms set forth above. Dated this 19th day of September, 2022. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?