Coyne et al v. Parkside Credit Union et al

Filing 13

ORDER TO CLARIFY re 10 Findings and Recommendations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kathleen L. DeSoto on 11/22/2024. (APP) Copy mailed to Coyne and Pearson

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
MISSOULA DIVISION

MORGAN COYNE and KEVIN W.
PEARSON,
vs.

CV 24-14-M-DLC-KLD

Plaintiffs,

ORDER

PARKSIDE CREDIT UNION,
EXPERIAN CORP., EQUIFAX,
TRANSUNION, and INNOVIS DATA
SOLUTIONS,
Defendants.
On November 20, 2024, the Court issued a Findings and Recommendation
and Order, recommending that all claims against Innovis Data Solutions be
dismissed without prejudice for failing to complete service within the 90-day
period provided for in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), but giving Plaintiffs
Morgan Coyne and Kevin Pearson until January 6, 2025, to properly effect service
on Experian, Equifax, TransUnion, and Parkside Credit Union in accordance with
Rule 4. (Doc. 10).
On November 22, 2024, Plaintiffs filed a brief in which they assert they have
properly served Defendants, and refer to attached exhibits that have not been
provided to the Court. (Doc. 11). For all of the reasons stated in the Court’s
1

November 20, 2024, Findings and Recommendation and Order, Plaintiffs still have
not filed proof that Experian, Equifax, TransUnion, and Parkside Credit Union
have been served with a summons and copy of the Complaint in accordance with
Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
As stated in the Findings and Recommendation and Order, Plaintiffs shall
have until January 6, 2025, within which to properly effect service on Experian,
Equifax, TransUnion, and Parkside Credit Union, and to file proof of proper
service with the Court.
DATED this 22nd day of November, 2024.
______________________________
Kathleen L. DeSoto
United States Magistrate Judge

2