Seger, et al v. USA, et al

Filing 380

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE that Attorney Stacey L. Mills is directed to pay the $20.00 biennial assessment or show cause why she is unable to pay this fee, on or before March 18, 2016. Show Cause Deadline set for 3/18/2016. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (Copies mailed) (MKR)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA IN RE: Attorney Stacey L. Mills 2015/2016 BIENNIAL ATTORNEY ASSESSMENT ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 4:99CV3056 Case No. 4:99CV3153 Case No. 4:99CV3154 Case No. 8:99CV315 SHOW CAUSE ORDER Pursuant to Nebraska General Rule 1.7(h), the court requires all attorneys enrolled in the bar of this court to pay a biennial assessment; the rule does not apply to attorneys who appear before the court pro hac vice or are employed by the federal government or a state, county, city or local government. The proceeds of this assessment defray the cost of maintaining the role of attorneys admitted to practice before this court, reimburse appointed counsel for reasonable expenses incurred in representing indigent litigants, and fund the Federal Practice Fund. The clerk's office sent out a notice to all Active/Due and Active/Paid attorneys requesting payment for the 2015/2016 Attorney Assessment; in December of 2015 a second Ex Parte Text Notice [Filing 378] was docketed in each case reminding the attorney to pay the fee; and counsel has received courtesy reminders by the chambers of Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. As of this date, Attorney Mills has a pending case(s) in this court and has not paid the 2015/2016 Attorney Assessment. Ms. Mills is directed to pay the $20.00 or show cause why she is unable to pay this fee, on or before March 18, 2016. Dated this 26th day of February 2016. BY THE COURT: s/ F.A. Gossett, III United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?