Lotter v. Houston (PURSUANT TO ORDER #21, SEND A COPY OF ALL UNSEALED FILINGS TO PETITIONER)

Filing 140

ORDER that according to counsel for the Respondent, the proper Respondent in this is case not Brian Gage, Warden, Tecumseh State Correctional Institution, but rather Scott Frakes, Director, Nebraska Department of Correctional Institutions. There was no formal motion to substitute Brian Gage, Warden, Tecumseh State Correctional Institution. Therefore, my direction to the Clerk of Court on September 15, 2015, was in error and the non-public remark should be stricken. The proper style of this case is John L. Lotter v. Scott Frakes, Director, Nebraska Department of Correctional Institutions, Case No. 4:04CV3187-RGK. Counsel shall act accordingly. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (LAC)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA JOHN L. LOTTER, Petitioner, V. SCOTT FRAKES, Director, Nebraska Department of Correctional Institutions, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 4:04CV3187 ORDER IT IS HEREWITH ORDERED that: (1) According to counsel for the Respondent, the proper Respondent in this is case not Brian Gage, Warden, Tecumseh State Correctional Institution, but rather Scott Frakes, Director, Nebraska Department of Correctional Institutions. (2) There was no formal motion to substitute Brian Gage, Warden, Tecumseh State Correctional Institution. Therefore, my direction to the Clerk of Court on September 15, 2015, was in error and the non-public remark should be stricken. (3) The proper style of this case is John L. Lotter v. Scott Frakes, Director, Nebraska Department of Correctional Institutions, Case No. 4:04CV3187-RGK. Counsel shall act accordingly. DATED this 21st day of September, 2015. BY THE COURT: Richard G. Kopf Senior United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?