Smith et al v. Parker et al

Filing 130

ORDER - The Motion for Leave to File Additional Evidence (Filing 121 ) filed by the Plaintiff-Intervenor State of Nebraska is granted, and the undersigned will consider Exhibits 2 through 9 filed in support of the motion (Filings 123-2 to 123-9) as part of the record with the understanding that (a) Exhibits 2 through 4 are presented by the State of Nebraska, and (b) Exhibits 5 through 9 are presented by the defendants in rebuttal. The highest quality images of the maps are presented at the URL locations shown in the motion, and the court may view such images over the Internet when reviewing the record. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (GJG)

Smith et al v. Parker et al

Doc. 130

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
RICHARD M. SMITH, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
and
STATE OF NEBRASKA,
Plaintiff-Intervenor
v.
MITCH PARKER, et al.,
Defendants,
and
THE UNITED STATES,
Defendant-Intervenor.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

4:07CV3101

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Leave to File Additional Evidence (Filing
121) filed by the Plaintiff-Intervenor State of Nebraska is granted, and the
undersigned will consider Exhibits 2 through 9 filed in support of the motion (Filings
123-2 to 123-9) as part of the record with the understanding that (a) Exhibits 2
through 4 are presented by the State of Nebraska, and (b) Exhibits 5 through 9 are
presented by the defendants in rebuttal. The highest quality images of the maps are
presented at the URL locations shown in the motion, and the court may view such
images over the Internet when reviewing the record.

Dockets.Justia.com

DATED this 13th day of August, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
Richard G. Kopf
Senior United States District Judge

*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The
U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend,
approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on
their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties
or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or
functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or
directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.
2