Leonor v. Houston
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Petitioner's Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment 39 is denied; Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Amend 43 is denied. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (copy mailed to pro se party)(CJP)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA JUAN LUIS LEONOR, Petitioner, v. ROBERT HOUSTON, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 4:07CV3139
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the court on Petitioner's Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment, which the court liberally construes as a Motion for Reconsideration. (Filing No. 39.) In his Motion, Petitioner requests that the court reconsider its October 31, 2008 Memorandum and Order and Judgment which dismissed the Petition with prejudice. (Filing Nos. 37 and 38.) Summarized, Plaintiff re-argues the merits of his claims and requests leave to amend his claims and add new claims. (Filing No. 39.) Petitioner also filed a Motion for Leave to Amend in which he requests leave to amend his Petition as set forth in his Motion to Alter or Amend. (Filing No. 43.) Respondent opposes both Motions. (Filing Nos. 41 and 44.) The court has carefully reviewed Petitioner's Motions, including the cases cited by Petitioner. The court finds no good cause for reconsideration of any portion of its October 31, 2008 Memorandum and Order and Judgment. In light of this, Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Amend (filing no. 43) is also denied. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner's Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (filing no. 39) is denied. 2. Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Amend (filing no. 43) is denied. December 17, 2008. BY THE COURT:
s/ Joseph F. Bataillon Chief United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?