Gray v. BNSF Railway Company et al

Filing 95

ORDER-This matter is before the court upon Defendants' supplemental motion in limine (filing 72 ) and the parties joint motion for expedited resolution of Defendants'supplemental motion in limine (filing 80 ). Having reviewed the matter, the court concludes that Defendants' supplemental motion in limine (filing 72 ) shall be denied.However, this ruling is without prejudice to consideration of specific objections to specific portions of the disputed evidence at trial. IT IS ORDERED: 1. The parties joint motion for expedited resolution of Defendants' supplemental motion in limine (filing 80 ) is granted; 2. Defendants supplemental motion in limine (filing 72 ) is denied. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (LKH, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FO R THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA D O N A L D L. GRAY, Plaintiff, V. B N SF RAILWAY COMPANY, a D elaw are Corporation, and B R O W N 'S CREW CAR OF W Y O M IN G , INC., D e fe n d a n t s . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

4 :0 7 C V 3 2 4 9

ORDER

T his matter is before the court upon Defendants' supplemental motion in limine (filing 72) and the parties' joint motion for expedited resolution of Defendants' su pp le me nta l motion in limine (filing 80). Having reviewed the matter, the court c on clu de s that Defendants' supplemental motion in limine (filing 72) shall be denied. H ow ever, this ruling is without prejudice to consideration of specific objections to specific portions of the disputed evidence at trial. IT IS ORDERED: 1. T he parties' joint motion for expedited resolution of Defendants' su pp le me nta l motion in limine (filing 80) is granted; 2. D e fe nd an ts' supplemental motion in limine (filing 72) is denied.

March 23, 2009. B Y THE COURT: s/R ichard G. Kopf United States District Judge