Cox v. General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems et al

Filing 35

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The plaintiff's motion to dismiss (filing 32 ) is granted, and that judgment shall be entered by separate document in accordance with this memorandum and order. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (GJG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA PHILLIP COX, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) GENERAL DYNAMICS ADVANCED ) INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC., ) ) GENERAL DYNAMICS ARMAMENT ) AND TECHNICAL PRODUCTS, INC., ) ) GENERAL DYNAMICS AEROSPACE, INC., ) ) GENERAL DYNAMICS COMBAT ) SYSTEMS, INC., and ) ) GENERAL DYNAMICS MARINE ) SYSTEMS, INC., ) ) Defendants. ) 4:07CV3264 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER The plaintiff has filed a motion to dismiss without prejudice his claims against these four defendants: (1) General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems, Inc.; (2) General Dynamics Aerospace, Inc.; (3) General Dynamics Combat Systems, Inc.; and (4) General Dynamics Marine Systems, Inc. (Filing 32) The remaining defendant, General Dynamics Armament and Technical Products, Inc., states that it does not oppose the motion. (Filing 34) In any event, no answer or motion for summary judgment has been filed. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). The court therefore finds that the motion should be granted. The court also finds there is no just reason for delay in entering judgment since the dismissal is without prejudice and the motion is unopposed. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff's motion to dismiss (filing 32) is granted, and that judgment shall be entered by separate document in accordance with this memorandum and order. August 31, 2009. BY THE COURT: Richard G. Kopf United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?