ConSteel Erectors v. Scharpf's Construction et al

Filing 89

ORDER regarding filing 85 . The parties have not requested a jury trial in this matter, but the final progression order of January 13, 2009 inadvertently set the trial as a jury trial. IT THEREFORE HEREBY IS ORDERED: Paragraph number 8 of the final progression order, filing no. 85 , is amended as follows: 8. Non-jury trial is set to commence, at the court's call, during the week of July 20, 2009 for a duration of four days in Lincoln, Nebraska, before the Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge. Unless otherwise ordered, jury selection shall be at the commencement of trial. Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester. (LKH)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA CONSTEEL ERECTORS, INC., Plaintiff, v. SCHARPF'S CONSTRUCTION, INC., KRAUS-ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, JAMES SCHARPF, JASON RUSNAK, MENARDS, INC., and TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 4:08CV3038 ORDER The parties have not requested a jury trial in this matter, but the final progression order of January 13, 2009 inadvertently set the trial as a jury trial. IT THEREFORE HEREBY IS ORDERED: Paragraph number 8 of the final progression order, filing no. 85, is amended as follows: 8. Non-jury trial is set to commence, at the court's call, during the week of July 20, 2009 for a duration of four days in Lincoln, Nebraska, before the Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge. Unless otherwise ordered, jury selection shall be at the commencement of trial. DATED February 2, 2009. BY THE COURT: s/ David L. Piester United States Magistrate Judge David L. Piester

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?