Ojeda v. Scottsbluff, City of et al

Filing 32

ORDER - 1. Defendants Unopposed Motion to Stay Rule 26 Requirements, filing 30 , is granted and the parties' Rule 26 planning conference report shall be filed within 30 days of resolution of the defendants' motion to dismiss. 2. The joint motion of the parties, filing 31 , to withdraw Defendants' Motion to Strike is granted and the motion to strike, filing 28 , is withdrawn. Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester. (JAB)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA STELLA M. OJEDA, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SCOTTSBLUFF, a political subdivision of the State of Nebraska, SCOTTSBLUFF POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHIEF ALEX MORENO, SGT. PHIL ECKERBERG, SGT. SHAWN McFARLAND, SGT. PHIL MARTINDALE, CAPT. KEVIN SPENCER, sued in their individual and professional capacities, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 4:08CV3067 ORDER IT IS ORDERED: 1. Defendants' Unopposed Motion to Stay Rule 26 Requirements, filing 30, is granted and the parties' Rule 26 planning conference report shall be filed within 30 days of resolution of the defendants' motion to dismiss. 2. The joint motion of the parties, filing 31, to withdraw Defendants' Motion to Strike is granted and the motion to strike, filing 28, is withdrawn. DATED September 8, 2008. BY THE COURT: s/ David L. Piester United States Magistrate Judge David L. Piester

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?