Dobson Brothers Construction v. Ratliff et al

Filing 141

ORDER - Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion (filing 140 ) for Extension of Time to Respond to the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendant American Contractors Indemnity Company (ACIC) is granted. Plaintiff's deadline for filing its opposi tion to defendant ACIC's Motion for Summary Judgment (filing 131 ) is extended until two weeks following (a) an order denying Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (filing 137 ), or (b) the production of the documents requested by Plaintiff or com pelled to be produced by the court. Defendant ACIC may file a reply to Plaintiff's opposing brief and evidence within the time frame set forth in NECivR 7.0.1(c) and NECivR 6.1(b), after which the Motion for Summary Judgment (filing 131 ) shall be deemed submitted. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (GJG)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
DOBSON BROTHERS
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a
Nebraska corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
RATLIFF, INC., an Oklahoma
corporation, and AMERICAN
CONTRACTORS INDEMNITY
COMPANY, a California
corporation,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

4:08CV3103

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED:
1.

Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion (filing 140) for Extension of Time to

Respond to the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendant American
Contractors Indemnity Company (ACIC) is granted;
2.

Plaintiff’s deadline for filing its opposition to defendant ACIC’s Motion

for Summary Judgment (filing 131) is extended until two weeks following (a) an order
denying Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (filing 137), or (b) the production of the
documents requested by Plaintiff or compelled to be produced by the court; and
3.

Defendant ACIC may file a reply to Plaintiff’s opposing brief and

evidence within the time frame set forth in NECivR 7.0.1(c) and NECivR 6.1(b), after
which the Motion for Summary Judgment (filing 131) shall be deemed submitted.

DATED this 11 th day of October, 2011.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Richard G. Kopf
United States District Judge

*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The
U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend,
approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on
their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties
or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or
functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or
directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.
2