Dobson Brothers Construction v. Ratliff et al
Filing
167
ORDER - The motion (filing 164 ) of the parties to vacate the order entered on April 10, 2012, as moot and joint motion to dismiss with prejudice is granted. The Clerk of Court shall strike this court's interlocutory order dated April 10, 2012, (filing 158 ). Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (TEL)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
DOBSON BROTHERS
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a
Nebraska corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
RATLIFF, INC., an Oklahoma
corporation, and AMERICAN
CONTRACTORS INDEMNITY
COMPANY, a California
corporation,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
4:08CV3103
ORDER
The parties have filed a joint motion (filing 164) to vacate this court’s
memorandum and order dated April 10, 2012, (filing 158) as moot due to a settlement
agreement that has been entered between the plaintiff and defendant American
Contractors Indemnity Company1 that has resolved all claims and liability issues
between the parties. The parties stipulate that all claims that were asserted or could
have been asserted in this action—other than claims related to indemnity or right to
contribution between the defendants—have been resolved in the settlement agreement,
and that all claims remaining before this court should be dismissed with prejudice.
As all parties have consented to the filing of the motion and dismissal of this case with
prejudice,
1
A binding arbitration occurred between defendant Ratliff, Inc., and the
plaintiff, and the order of the arbitrator was confirmed as an order of the United States
District Court for the Western District of Missouri. (See Filing 119, Joint Status
Report Regarding Progress of Arbitration Proceedings Between Ratliff and Dobson.)
IT IS ORDERED:
1.
The motion (filing 164) of the parties to vacate the order entered on April
10, 2012, as moot and joint motion to dismiss with prejudice is granted;
2.
The Clerk of Court shall strike this court’s interlocutory order dated April
10, 2012, (filing 158);
3.
Judgment dismissing with prejudice all claims remaining before this
court shall be entered by separate document.
DATED this 24 th day of July, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
Richard G. Kopf
Senior United States District Judge
*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The
U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend,
approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on
their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties
or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or
functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or
directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?