Thompson v. Douglas County Corrections et al

Filing 13

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff shall have until March 20, 2009, to apprise the court of his current address, in the absence of which this case will be dismissed withoutprejudice and without further notice; and 2. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadlinein this case using the following text: March 20, 2009: deadline for informingcourt of new address.Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(PCV, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA TROY M. THOMPSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) DOUGLAS COUNTY CORRECTIONS, ) ET AL., ) ) Defendants. ) CASE NO. 4:08CV3137 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the court on its own motion. On January 23, 2009, the Clerk of the court sent a Memorandum and Order (Filing No. 11) to Plaintiff at his last known address. On January 29, 2009, that document was returned to the court as undeliverable, and no forwarding information was provided. (Filing No. 12.) Plaintiff has an obligation to keep the court informed of his current address at all times. See NEGenR 1.3(e) and (g) (requiring pro se parties to adhere to local rules and inform the court of address changes within 30 days). This case cannot be prosecuted in this court if Plaintiff's whereabouts remain unknown. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff shall have until March 20, 2009, to apprise the court of his current address, in the absence of which this case will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice; and The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: March 20, 2009: deadline for informing court of new address. 2. DATED this 20th day of February, 2009. BY THE COURT: s/Laurie Smith Camp United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?