Morrison Enterprises et al v. Dravo Corporation

Filing 373

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 304 "Defendant Dravo Corporation's Request for the Court to Take Judicial Notice of the United States' Amicus Curiae Memorandum filed in ITT Industries, Inc. v. Borgwarner, Inc. in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment Related to Plaintiff's Well D Claims." Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (EJL)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA MORRISON ENTERPRISES, LLC, and CITY OF HASTINGS, Nebraska, Plaintiffs, v. DRAVO CORPORATION, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 4:08CV3142 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON "DEFENDANT DRAVO CORPORATION'S REQUEST FOR THE COURT TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE OF THE UNITED STATES' AMICUS CURIAE MEMORANDUM FILED IN ITT INDUSTRIES, INC. V. BORGWARNER, INC. IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RELATED TO PLAINTIFF'S WELL D CLAIMS" On September 15, 2009, Dravo Corporation (Dravo) filed a "Request for the Court to Take Judicial Notice of the United States' Amicus Curiae Memorandum Filed in ITT Industries, Inc. v. Borgwarner, Inc. in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment Related to Plaintiffs' Well D Claims." (Filing 304.) In response, Morrison Enterprises, LLC (Morrison) states that it does not dispute the legal position put forward in the United States' amicus brief; it argues, however, that Dravo's request should be denied because the facts of ITT Industries are distinguishable from those of the instant case. (See filing 327 at 2.) I shall consider the amicus brief cited by Dravo as I analyze its motion for summary judgment on the plaintiff's claims related to the Well D System. (See filing 154.) To that extent, IT IS ORDERED that Dravo's request for the court to take judicial notice of the United States' amicus curiae memorandum in ITT Industries, Inc. v. Borgwarner, Inc., filing 304, is granted. Dated November 9, 2009. BY THE COURT s/ Warren K. Urbom United States Senior District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?