Archer Daniels Midland Company v. Soucie

Filing 27

ORDER - It has come to the court's attention that two initial progression orders have been entered in this case. IT THEREFORE HEREBY IS ORDERED, The first Order for Initial Progression of Case filed January 6, 2009 (filing no. 23 ) is stricken and the deadlines set forth in the second order filed January 12, 2009 (filing no. 24 ) shall apply. Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester. (JAB)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. PAUL SOUCIE, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

4:08CV3215

ORDER

It has come to the court's attention that two initial progression orders have been entered in this case. IT THEREFORE HEREBY IS ORDERED, The first Order for Initial Progression of Case filed January 6, 2009 (filing no. 23) is stricken and the deadlines set forth in the second order filed January 12, 2009 (filing no. 24) shall apply. DATED this 21st day of January, 2009. BY THE COURT: s/ David L. Piester United States Magistrate Judge

David L. Piester