Brown v. ABM Industries et al

Filing 36

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff is given until July 16, 2009 to show cause why her claims against Brenda Thompas should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) or for want of prosecution, in the absence of which plaintiff&# 039;s claims against this defendant will be dismissed without further notice. Plaintiff is given until July 16, 2009 to show cause why her claims against Roger Benson should not be dismissed for want of prosecution in the absence of which plaintiff's claims against this defendant will be dismissed without further notice.( Show Cause Deadline set for 7/16/2009.) Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (GJG)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA BETTY J. BROWN, Plaintiff, v. SSA SECURITY, INC., LAVERN THOMASON, ROGER BENSON, and BRENDA THOMPAS, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

4:08CV3233

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Pursuant to the court's order of May 4, 2009, (filing no. 34), the plaintiff was given thirty days to either properly serve or move to dismiss defendant Brenda Thompas, and to either move to dismiss or for move for default and default judgment against defendant Robert Benson. (See filing no. 34, ¶¶ 14 & 15). The plaintiff has not complied. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Plaintiff is given until July 16, 2009 to show cause why her claims against Brenda Thompas should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) or for want of prosecution, in the absence of which plaintiff's claims against this defendant will be dismissed without further notice. Plaintiff is given until July 16, 2009 to show cause why her claims against Robert Benson should not be dismissed for want of prosecution,

2)

in the absence of which plaintiff's claims against this defendant will be dismissed without further notice. DATED this 6th day of July, 2009. BY THE COURT: s/Richard G. Kopf United States District Judge

2