Brown v. ABM Industries et al

Filing 37

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding Memorandum and Order 36 . The plaintiff was given until July 16, 2009 to show cause why her claims against Brenda Thompas and Roger Benson should not be dismissed. The plaintiff has failed to respond. Accordingly, Plain tiff's claims against Brenda Thompas are dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) and for want of prosecution. Plaintiff's claims against Roger Benson are dismissed for want of prosecution. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JAB)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA BETTY J. BROWN, Plaintiff, v. SSA SECURITY, Inc., LAVERN THOMASON, ROGER BENSON, and BRENDA THOMPAS, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

4:08CV3233

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

The plaintiff was given until July 16, 2009 to show cause why her claims against Brenda Thompas should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) or for want of prosecution, and why her claims against Roger Benson should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. The plaintiff has failed to respond. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Plaintiff's claims against Brenda Thompas are dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) and for want of prosecution. Plaintiff's claims against Roger Benson are dismissed for want of prosecution.

2)

DATED this 17th day of July, 2009. BY THE COURT: s/Richard G. Kopf United States District Judge