Hrdlicka v. Merry Maids Limited Partnership et al

Filing 22

ORDER - The deadline for defendant to respond to plaintiff's motion to amend has passed, and no response has been filed. The motion is therefore deemed unopposed. IT THEREFORE HEREBY IS ORDERED, 1. Plaintiff's motion to amend, filing no. [1 8], is granted and the amended complaint shall be filed forthwith. 2. Plaintiff's unopposed voluntary dismissal of defendant Servicemaster, filing no. 19 , is granted and Servicemaster is dismissed without prejudice. Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Piester. (LKH)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA BRENDA HRDLICKA, Plaintiff, v. MERRY MAIDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SERVICEMASTER, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

4:09CV3012

ORDER

The deadline for defendant to respond to plaintiff's motion to amend has passed, and no response has been filed. is therefore deemed unopposed. IT THEREFORE HEREBY IS ORDERED, 1. Plaintiff's motion to amend, filing no. 18, is granted and the amended complaint shall be filed forthwith. 2. Plaintiff's unopposed voluntary dismissal of defendant Servicemaster, filing no. 19, is granted and Servicemaster is dismissed without prejudice. DATED this 24th day of March, 2009. BY THE COURT: s/ David L. Piester United States Magistrate Judge The motion

David L. Piester