Martinez v. Cargill Meat Solutions

Filing 102

ORDER - Defendant's motion for extension of time to file a reply brief (Case No. 4:09CV3079, filing 100 ; Case No. 8:09CV247, filing 72) is granted; Defendant shall file its brief in reply to Plaintiffs' opposition to Defendant's motion for partial summary judgment on or before December 3, 2010. Member Cases: 4:09-cv-03079-RGK-CRZ, 8:09-cv-00247-RGK -CRZ Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (TCL )

Download PDF
Martinez v. Cargill Meat Solutions Doc. 102 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA JUAN MARTINEZ, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) V. ) ) CARGILL MEAT SOLUTIONS, ) Corporation, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) ) DALE HAFERLAND, JUAN ) MUNOZ, KARLA VELASQUEZ, and MANUE CORONA, on behalf of ) ) themselves and all other similarly ) situated individuals, ) ) Plaintiffs. ) ) V. ) ) CARGILL MEAT SOLUTIONS, ) Corporation, ) ) Defendant. ______________________________ ) 4:09CV3079 ORDER _______________________________ 8:09CV247 ORDER _______________________________ This matter is before the court on Defendant's motion for extension of time to file a brief in reply to Plaintiffs' opposition to Defendant's motion for partial summary judgment. (Case No. 4:09CV3079, filing 100; Case No. 8:09CV247, filing 72.) After careful consideration of Plaintiffs' objections to the motion (Case No. Dockets.Justia.com 4:09CV3079, filing 101; Case No. 8:09CV247, filing 73), the court finds that the motion shall be granted. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Defendant's motion for extension of time to file a reply brief (Case No. 4:09CV3079, filing 100; Case No. 8:09CV247, filing 72) is granted; Defendant shall file its brief in reply to Plaintiffs' opposition to Defendant's motion for partial summary judgment on or before December 3, 2010. 2. On November 17, 2010, BY THE COURT: Richard G. Kopf United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?