Kaufman v. CVS Pharmacy et al

Filing 26

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 24 , defendant's Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Steven D. Davidson, Jennifer D. Tricker, and Baird Holm LLP are hereby withdrawn as counsel for defendant CVS Pharmacy, Inc. David A. Dudley, and Baylor, Evnen, Curtiss, Grimit & Witt LLP are counsel of record for Davaco, Inc. and CVS Pharmacy, Inc. The cross-claims filed by defendant CVS Pharmacy, Inc. against Davaco, Inc. are dismissed without prejudice. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (GJG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA SHARON KAUFMAN, Plaintiff, v. CVS PHARMACY, Inc., and DAVACO, Inc., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 4:09CV3087 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER According to a motion jointly filed by defendant CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and defendant Davaco, Inc., (filing no. 24), Davaco has agreed to defend and indemnify CVS for the plaintiffs claims in this lawsuit. The defendants have therefore filed a joint motion requesting an order: 1) allowing CVS' counsel of record, Steven D. Davidson, Jennifer D. Tricker, and Baird Holm LLP, to withdraw; 2) entering the appearance of David A. Dudley and the law firm of Baylor, Evnen, Curtiss, Grimit & Witt LLP as counsel for both Davaco and CVS; and 3) dismissing CVS' cross-claims against Davaco in their entirety. Counsel for the plaintiff takes no position on defendants' motion. The motion will be granted. IT IS ORDERED that defendants' motion, (filing no. 24), is granted, and 1) 2) 3) Steven D. Davidson, Jennifer D. Tricker, and Baird Holm LLP are hereby withdrawn as counsel for defendant CVS Pharmacy, Inc. David A. Dudley, and Baylor, Evnen, Curtiss, Grimit & Witt LLP are counsel of record for Davaco, Inc. and CVS Pharmacy, Inc. The cross-claims filed by defendant CVS Pharmacy, Inc. against Davaco, Inc. are dismissed without prejudice. August 14, 2009. BY THE COURT: Richard G. Kopf United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?