Douglass v. Astrue

Filing 33

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting Motion for Attorney Fees 29 . IT IS ORDERED that: The Plaintiff's application for attorney fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (filing 29 ) is granted; and The Plaintiff is awarded an attorney fee in the amount of $4,294.37, payable to the Plaintiff as litigant and may be subject to offset to satisfy any pre-existing debt the litigant may owe to the United States. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (TEL)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA REBECCA A. DOUGLASS, Plaintiff, vs. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 4:09CV3124 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the court upon Plaintiff’s application for attorney fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (filing 29). Plaintiff requests fees in the total amount of $4,294.37, which represents 24.8 hours of work by her attorney, at an average hourly rate of $173.16. Defendant does not oppose Plaintiff’s application. See filing 32. The court has determined that Plaintiff was indeed the prevailing party in this action, as the Commissioner’s decision was reversed and remanded for calculation and payment of benefits; that the application for fees was filed in a timely fashion; and that the position of the Commissioner was not substantially justified. Plaintiff therefore is entitled to an award of reasonable attorney fees. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The Plaintiff’s application for attorney fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (filing 29) is granted; and 2. The Plaintiff is awarded an attorney fee in the amount of $4,294.37, payable to the Plaintiff as litigant and may be subject to offset to satisfy any pre-existing debt the litigant may owe to the United States. Dated this 25th day of April, 2011. BY THE COURT: s/F.A. Gossett, III United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?