Dean v. Gage County, Nebraska, et al

Filing 702

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that no later than close of business on 8/10/18 the prevailing parties who filed the motion for attorney fees and costs and the index but without a brief shall file a brief addressing whether the motion is timely, in compliance with the local rules of this court, the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals local rules, federal rules of civil procedure and whether the law and the facts warrant the relief sought on the merits. No later than the close of business on 8/22/18, any party w ho opposes the granting of the motion for attorney fees and costs shall file a brief and index of evidence in opposition. If an opposition is filed, the prevailing parties may submit a reply brief and additional affidavits in reply no later than the close of business on 8/29/18. Member Cases: 4:09-cv-03144-RGK-CRZ et al.Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (CCB)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) RICHARD T. SMITH, et al., ) Defendants. ) LOIS P. WHITE, as Personal ) Representative of the Estate of ) Joseph White, deceased, ) Plaintiff, ) v. COUNTY OF GAGE, NEBRASKA, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) KATHLEEN A. GONZALEZ, ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) RICHARD T. SMITH, et al., ) Defendants. ) THOMAS W. WINSLOW, ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) RICHARD T. SMITH, et al., ) Defendants. ) ADA JOANN TAYLOR, ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) RICHARD T. SMITH, et al., ) Defendants. ) DEBRA SHELDEN, ) Plaintiff, ) v. COUNTY OF GAGE, NEBRASKA, et al., ) ) Defendants. JAMES L. DEAN, 4:09CV3144 4:09CV3145 4:09CV3146 4:09CV3147 4:09CV3148 4:11CV3099 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER To avoid ambiguity under this court’s local rules, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals Local Rules (8th Cir. R.) and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and because the prevailing parties have not sought an award of attorney fees and costs from the Court of Appeals under 8th Cir. R. 47C or sought a remand to this court pursuant to Rule 47C as are the customary alternative practices, and yet it appears that notwithstanding these omissions this court may nevertheless have jurisdiction, Little Rock Sch. Dist. v. State of Ark., 127 F.3d 693, 696–97 (8th Cir. 1997), IT IS ORDERED that: 1. No later than the close of business on Friday, August 10, 2018, the prevailing parties who filed the motion for attorney fees and costs (filing no. 700) and the index (filing no. 701), but without a brief, shall file a brief addressing whether the motion is timely, whether the motion is in compliance with the local rules of this court, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals Local Rules, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and whether the law and the facts warrant the relief sought on the merits. 2. No later than the close of business on Wednesday, August 22, 2018, any party who opposes the granting of the motion for attorney fees and costs shall file a brief and index of evidence in opposition. 3. If an opposition described in the preceding paragraph is filed, the prevailing parties may submit a reply brief and additional affidavits in reply no later than the close of business on Wednesday, August 29, 2018. August 1, 2018. BY THE COURT: s/ Richard G. Kopf Senior United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?