Walters v. Astrue

Filing 15

ORDER granting 14 Motion for Exteions of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Brief. Set/Reset All Deadlines, 12 . The defendant shall have on or before January 19, 2010,in which to file and serve its response to the plaintiff's brief; and the plaintiff within one week after the defendant's answer brief is filed, the plaintiff may file a reply brief and either party may request oral argument or make any other request which may be permitted under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); and in the absence of an order setting the case for oral argument or scheduling further proceedings, the case shall be deemed to be submitted at the expiration of the time period specified in paragraph 3 hereof.Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (EJL )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA DARROLD E. WALTERS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 4:09CV3150 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S BRIEF IT IS ORDERED that: 1. the Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Brief, filing 14, is granted, and the defendant shall have on or before January 19, 2010, in which to file and serve its response to the plaintiff's brief; and the plaintiff within one week after the defendant's answer brief is filed, the plaintiff may file a reply brief and either party may request oral argument or make any other request which may be permitted under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); and in the absence of an order setting the case for oral argument or scheduling further proceedings, the case shall be deemed to be submitted at the expiration of the time period specified in paragraph 3 hereof. 2. 3. Dated December 22, 2009. BY THE COURT s/ Warren K. Urbom United States Senior District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?