LOL Finance Company v. Johnson et al

Filing 116

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding MOTION to Compel 110 filed by LOL Finance Company, and OBJECTION to 112 filed by First National Bank of Omaha. Consistent with the terms and deadlines set forth in the court's previous order 103 , LOL and FNBO shall confer to resolve the issue of whether a supplemental deposition of Mr. Kalkowski is needed and whether and to what extent sanctions should be awarded.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (CRZ)

Download PDF
LOL Finance Company v. Johnson et al Doc. 116 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA LOL FINANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT P. JOHNSON, individually and, KERI J. MALOLEY, individually and, JOHN DOE, ABC COMPANY, FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA, and PAUL JOHNSON & SONS CATTLE CO., Inc., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 4:09CV3224 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Following the deposition of defendant First National Bank of Omaha's ("FNBO") representative, Chris Kalkowski, the plaintiff filed an additional motion to compel and request for sanctions. Filing No. 110. The plaintiff claims FNBO failed to fully provide discovery responses prior to Mr. Kalkowski's deposition in violation of the court's order, (filing no. 103). Based on FNBO's response to the motion to compel (filing no. 112) and the plaintiff's reply (filing no. 113), it appears FNBO's documents have now been produced. However, the question remains as to whether FNBO's post-deposition production of documents prejudiced the plaintiff's ability to fully depose Mr. Kalkowski and, if so, what remedy and/or sanction should be ordered as a result of FNBO's untimely response. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) On or before August 23, 2010, the following actions must be completed: a. The parties will discuss and attempt to reach a resolution regarding the necessity and scope of any supplemental deposition of Mr. Kalkowski. Any supplemental deposition will be limited to new matters raised by or within documents produced by FNBO after the deposition was conducted. To the Dockets.Justia.com extent any supplemental deposition is needed due to FNBO's untimely discovery responses, FNBO will be responsible for the reasonable costs and expenses of this supplemental deposition. If the parties reach an agreement regarding a supplemental deposition, they shall file a joint stipulation reflecting that agreement on or before August 25, 2010. b. Counsel for LOL Finance and FNBO will discuss and attempt to reach a resolution on LOL Finance's motion for sanctions, (filing no. 110). If the parties reach an agreement on sanctions, they shall file a joint stipulation reflecting that agreement on or before August 25, 2010. 2) If the discussions mandated in Paragraphs 1(a) & (b) of this order do not result in an amicable resolution, LOL shall file a motion setting forth the outstanding issues no later than August 30, 2010. With respect to any motion requesting attorneys' fees, the motion shall be accompanied by an affidavit describing, in detail, the basis for any requested fees and expenses. 3) To the extent LOL's motion, (filing no. 110), and FNBO's objection (filing no. 112), raise and address the issue of sanctions, these motions remain pending for further consideration following the parties' compliance with this order. DATED this 19th day of August, 2010. BY THE COURT: s/ Cheryl R. Zwart United States Magistrate Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?