Russell v. Houston et al

Filing 84

ORDER granting 78 Motion to Strike. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (CRZ)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA PATRICK RONALD RUSSELL, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT HOUSTON, DENNIS BAKEWELL, MELVIN ROUF, CURTIS MOFFAT, MICHAEL EDISON, and MARK DANNER, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 4:09CV3249 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER The defendants have moved to strike Plaintiff’s Exhibits 2, 7, 8 and 10 as set forth in the parties’ exhibit list, (filing no. 73). After conferring with the parties, the court finds that the plaintiff did not timely and promptly disclose these exhibits to his court-appointed counsel or the defendants as required under Rule 26(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See filing no. 80-1. The plaintiff’s oral motion to add an additional exhibit, (referred to during the telephone conference as proposed exhibit 31), is granted. Accordingly, 1) The defendants’ motion to strike, (filing no. 78), is granted. 2) The defendants shall file a revised exhibit list, with the deletions and addition discussed above and the listing of all objections thereto, by August 22, 2011. DATED this 19th day of August, 2011. BY THE COURT: s/ Cheryl R. Zwart United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?