Citizens in Charge et al v. Gale

Filing 119

ORDER - On September 8, 2011, Plaintiffs and Plaintiff-Intervenors filed an unopposed motion for a minor amendment to this Court's Memorandum and Order dated August 30, 2011. For the reasons set forth in that motion (Filing No. 113 ), the motion is hereby GRANTED. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (AOA)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA _______________________________________ ) CITIZENS IN CHARGE, MICHAEL ) Case No.: 4:09-cv-03255-JFB-TDT GROENE, and DONALD SLUTI, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF NEBRASKA and ) LIBERTARIAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, ) ) Plaintiff-Intervenors, ) ORDER ) v. ) ) JOHN A. GALE, in his official capacity as ) Secretary of State of the State of Nebraska, ) ) Defendant. ) _______________________________________ ) On September 8, 2011, Plaintiffs and Plaintiff-Intervenors filed an unopposed motion for a minor amendment to this Court’s Memorandum and Order dated August 30, 2011. For the reasons set forth in that motion (Filing No. 113), the motion is hereby GRANTED. The Memorandum and Order dated August 30, 2011 will be amended on page 4 as follows: In 2010 the Libertarian Party implemented a local petition drive for one of its candidates the recall of the Omaha mayor. The intervenors contend they were forced to pay one of the KENO companies extra money to assist with this drive. AGT, the KENO petition circulation company, initially intended to declined to help, but later agreed to do so. This company is geared towards gaming and KENO issues, and not towards initiatives of this type. In 2010, AGT refused to carry out any petitioning work for the recall of the Omaha mayor. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 5th day of October, 2011. BY THE COURT: s/ Joseph F. Bataillon Chief United States District Judge 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?