Campbell v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 18

ORDER granting 17 Plaintiff's Motion for Extensiono f Time to File Brief. the plaintiff shall file and serve her brief on or before June 11, 2010; The defendant shall have 35 days from the date on which the plaintiffs brief is filed in which t o file an answer brief; within one week after the defendants answer brief is filed, the plaintiff may file a reply brief and either party may request oral argument or make any other request which may be permitted under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); and in the absence of an order setting the case for oral argument or scheduling further proceedings, the case shall be deemed to be submitted at the expiration of the time period specified in paragraph 4 above. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (EJL)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA CHARLOTTE M. CAMPBELL, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 4:09CV3256 ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF IT IS ORDERED that: 1. 2. 3. the Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief, filing 17, is granted; the plaintiff shall file and serve her brief on or before June 11, 2010; the defendant shall have 35 days from the date on which the plaintiff's brief is filed in which to file an answer brief; within one week after the defendant's answer brief is filed, the plaintiff may file a reply brief and either party may request oral argument or make any other request which may be permitted under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); and in the absence of an order setting the case for oral argument or scheduling further proceedings, the case shall be deemed to be submitted at the expiration of the time period specified in paragraph 4 above. 4. 5. Dated June 7, 2010. BY THE COURT s/ Warren K. Urbom United States Senior District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?