Doe v. Nebraska State Patrol et al

Filing 207

ORDER - The Unopposed Motion for Permission to Restrict (filing no. 513) is granted. As provided below, the Unopposed Motion to Redact (filing no. 514) is granted in part and otherwise, to wit: As of approximately 2:21 P.M. on July 23, 2012, the digital audio recording for the morning session of July 18, 2012 of the non jury trial has been restricted so that it may only be accessed by counsel of record and case participants. The transcriber has been notified when preparing the transcript to file the bench conference separately as a restricted document. The motion is otherwise denied. This order pertains to Case Nos. 4:10CV3005 and 4:09CV3266. Member Cases: 8:09-cv-00456-RGK-CRZ, 4:09-cv-03266-RGK-CRZ, 4:10-cv-03005-RGK-CRZ Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (AOA)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA JOHN DOE AND JANE DOE 1 THROUGH 36, et al., ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, V. STATE OF NEBRASKA, et al., Defendants. 8:09CV456 ORDER IT IS ORDERED that: (1) The Unopposed Motion for Permission to Restrict (filing no. 513) is granted. (2) As provided below, the Unopposed Motion to Redact (filing no. 514) is granted in part and otherwise, to wit: A. As of approximately 2:21 P.M. on July 23, 2012, the digital audio recording for the morning session of July 18, 2012 of the non jury trial has been restricted so that it may only be accessed by counsel of record and case participants. B. The transcriber has been notified when preparing the transcript to file the bench conference separately as a restricted document. C. (3) The motion is otherwise denied. This order pertains to Case Nos. 4:10CV3005 and 4:09CV3266. DATED this 23 rd day of July, 2012. BY THE COURT: Richard G. Kopf Senior United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?