Phelps-Roper v. Heineman et al

Filing 118

ORDER granting 117 Motion to Dismiss Party. All claims asserted by Plaintiff Shirley L. Phelps-Roper against Defendants Anthony McPhillips and Steven M. Curry are dismissed with prejudice; and Defendants McPhillips and Curry will pay their own costs, expenses and attorney fees; and Plaintiff Phelps-Roper will bear her own costs, expenses and attorney fees as to Defendants McPhillips and Curry. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (ADB, )

-FG3 Phelps-Roper v. Heineman et al

Doc. 118

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA SHIRLEY L. PHELPS-ROPER, Plaintiff, v. DAVE HEINEMAN, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 4:09CV3268

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the parties' Joint Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice (Filing No. 117). The stipulation complies with the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and the Court concludes that it should be approved. Each party will bear its own costs and attorney fees. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1. 2. The parties' Joint Stipulation for Dismissal (Filing No. 117) is approved; All claims asserted by Plaintiff Shirley L. Phelps-Roper against Defendants Anthony McPhillips and Steven M. Curry are dismissed with prejudice; and Defendants McPhillips and Curry will pay their own costs, expenses and attorney fees; and Plaintiff Phelps-Roper will bear her own costs, expenses and attorney fees as to Defendants McPhillips and Curry.

3.

DATED this 9th day of July, 2010. BY THE COURT:

s/Laurie Smith Camp United States District Judge

Dockets.Justia.com