Phelps-Roper v. Heineman et al

Filing 319

ORDER denying 318 Richard Hedrick's Motion to Intervene. The Clerk shall mail a copy of this Order to Richard Hedrick at his address of record. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (Copy mailed as directed to 404 Mormon Tr, Lincoln, NE 68521) (JSF)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA SHIRLEY L. PHELPS-ROPER, Plaintiff, V. JOHN/JANE DOE(S), in Their Official Capacities, PETE RICKETTS, In his Capacity as Governor of the State of Nebraska, DOUG PETERSON, In His Capacity as Attorney General of the State of Nebraska, and TODD SCHMADERER, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 4:09CV3268 ORDER On August 17, 2015, Richard Hedrick, pro se, filed a Motion to Intervene (filing 318) in this case. The Motion will be denied as untimely. A request to intervene must be done on timely motion. Fed. R. Civ. P. 24. The timeliness of a motion to intervene is assessed by “considering all the circumstances of the case.” U.S. v. Union Elec. Co., 64 F.3d 1152, 1159-60 (8th Cir. 1995). When evaluating timeliness, a court should consider “(1) the extent the litigation has progressed at the time of the motion to intervene; (2) the prospective intervenor’s knowledge of the litigation; (3) the reason for the delay in seeking intervention; and (4) whether the delay in seeking intervention may prejudice the existing parties.” Planned Parenthood of the Heartland v. Heineman, 664 F.3d 716, 718 (8th Cir. 2011). This case was filed in December, 2009. Trial has been held, and a post-trial brief has been submitted. Allowing Hedrick to intervene at this time would clearly prejudice the existing parties. Hedrick has offered no reason for his delay in seeking to intervene. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED the Motion to Intervene (filing 318) is denied. The Clerk of Court shall mail a copy of this Order to Richard Hedrick at his address of record. DATED August 19, 2015. BY THE COURT: S/ F.A. Gossett United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?