Phelps-Roper v. Heineman et al
Filing
70
ORDER granting 45 Motion to Continue submitted by Defendants Dave Heineman, Jon Bruning, Todd J. Hutton, and the Nebraska Supreme Court. The hearing on the Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction 5 is continued pending the Court's ruling on the Defendants' Motions to Dismiss and Abstain or in the Alternative Motions to Stay Proceedings and for Protective Order (Filing Nos. 42 , 47 , 51 , 52 , and 56 ). Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (JAE)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA SHIRLEY L. PHELPS-ROPER, Plaintiff, v. DAVE HEINEMAN, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 4:09CV3268
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Continue (Filing No. 45) submitted by Defendants Dave Heineman, Jon Bruning, Todd J. Hutton, and the Nebraska Supreme Court. Defendants seek to continue the hearing on Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction until the Court resolves Defendants' Motions to Dismiss and Abstain or in the Alternative Motions to Stay Proceedings and for a Protective Order (Filing Nos. 42, 47, 51, 52, and 56). For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Motion to Continue (Filing No. 45) submitted by Defendants Dave
Heineman, Jon Bruning, Todd J. Hutton, and the Nebraska Supreme Court, is granted; and 2. The hearing on the Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Filing No. 5) is continued pending the Court's ruling on the Defendants' Motions to Dismiss and Abstain or in the Alternative Motions to Stay Proceedings and for Protective Order (Filing Nos. 42, 47, 51, 52, and 56). DATED this 23rd day of February, 2010. BY THE COURT: s/Laurie Smith Camp United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?