Doe v. Nebraska, State of et al
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that on or before October 5, 2010, the plaintiff shall either file a motion for voluntary dismissal of this case, or show cause why his case should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. In the absence of timely compliance with this order, this case may be dismissed without further notice. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (ADB, )
- C R Z Doe v. Nebraska, State of et al
D o c . 46
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA J O H N DOE, Plaintiff, v. S T A T E OF NEBRASKA, et. al., , D e f e n d a n ts . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
4 :1 0 C V 3 0 0 4
M E M O R A N D U M AND ORDER
T h e plaintiff herein did not participate in preparing the Rule 26(f) report of parties' p la n n in g conference entered in the lead case, John Doe and Jane Doe 1 through 20 et al v. S ta te of Nebraska et al, 8:09cv456 (see 8:09cv456, filing no. 359). Plaintiff's counsel has a d v is e d the court that his client may move to voluntarily dismiss this action, but a motion for v o lu n ta ry dismissal has not been filed. A c c o r d i n g l y, IT IS ORDERED: 1) O n or before October 5, 2010, the plaintiff shall either file a motion for v o lu n ta ry dismissal of this case, or show cause why his case should not be d is m is s e d for want of prosecution. In the absence of timely compliance with this order, this case may be d is m is s e d without further notice.
D A T E D this 23 r d day of September, 2010. B Y THE COURT: s/ Cheryl R. Zwart United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?