Daugherty v. City of Lincoln et al

Filing 13

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding returned mail 12 . This case cannot be prosecuted in this court if Plaintiff's whereabouts remain unknown. Plaintiff shall have until November 12, 2010, to apprise the court of his current address, in the absence o f which this case will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. ***Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 11/12/2010: deadline for informing court of new address. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(JAB)

-PRSE Daugherty v. City of Lincoln et al

Doc. 13

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA ARRMON H. DAUGHERTY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CITY OF LINCOLN, LINCOLN POLICE ) DEPARTMENT, ARMSTRONG, Sgt 1257, ) DENZIN, Ofc 1622, HOSE, Ofc 1606, ) SMITH, Ofc 826, and VIGIL, Ofc 1570, ) ) Defendants. ) 4:10CV3111

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on its own motion. On September 27, 2010, the Clerk of the court sent a Memorandum and Order to Plaintiff at his last known address. (Filing No. 11.) On October 1, 2010, it was returned to the court as undeliverable, and no forwarding information was provided. (Filing No. 12.) Plaintiff has an obligation to keep the court informed of his current address at all times. See NEGenR 1.3(e) and (g) (requiring pro se parties to adhere to local rules and inform the court of address changes within 30 days). This case cannot be prosecuted in this court if Plaintiff's whereabouts remain unknown. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff shall have until November 12, 2010, to apprise the court of his current address, in the absence of which this case will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. 2. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: November 12, 2010: deadline for informing court of new address. DATED this 13th day of October, 2010. BY THE COURT:

s/ Joseph F. Bataillon Chief United States District Judge

*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or W e b sites. The U.S. District Court for the District o f Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they p r o v i d e on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their W e b sites. The c o u r t accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases t o work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.
Dockets.Justia.com