-CRZ Phelps-Roper

Filing 36

ORDER. Because counsel for the State defendants and the City of Omaha defendants have consented to the expansion and enlargement of the temporary restraining order, IT IS ORDERED that counsel for the State defendants and the City of Omaha are excused from the hearing at 1:00 p.m. today. The hearing will otherwise take place regarding those defendants who have not submitted such a consent. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (KLL, )

Download PDF
-CRZ Phelps-Roper v. Bruning Doc. 36 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA MARGY M. PHELPS-ROPER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) V. ) ) JON BRUNING, Individually and in his ) Official Capacity as Attorney General of ) the State of Nebraska, COLONEL ) BRYAN TUMA, Individually and in his ) Official Capacity as Superintendent of ) the Nebraska State Patrol, L KENNETH ) POLIKOV, Individually and in his ) Official Capacity as Sarpy County ) Attorney, LEONARD HOULOOSE, ) Individually and in his Official Capacity ) as Chief of the Papillion Police ) Department, DONALD KLEINE, ) Individually and in his Official Capacity ) as Douglas County Attorney, ALEX ) HAYES, Individually and in his Official ) Capacity as Chief of the Omaha Police ) Department, and JOHN STACEY, ) Individually and in his Official Capacity ) as Chief of the Bellevue Police ) Department, ) ) Defendants. ) ) 4:10CV3131 ORDER Because counsel for the State defendants and the City of Omaha defendants have consented to the expansion and enlargement of the temporary restraining order, IT IS ORDERED that counsel for the State defendants and the City of Omaha are excused from the hearing at 1:00 p.m. today. The hearing will otherwise take place regarding those defendants who have not submitted such a consent. Dockets.Justia.com DATED this 15th day of July, 2010. BY THE COURT: Richard G. Kopf United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?