Young v. Heineman et al

Filing 37

SECOND AMENDED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER the defendants' motion to clarify 35 is granted; the defendants are restrained from taking any further action to enforce Nebraska Revised Statute 81-885.03 against plaintiff or the 7/20/2010 cease and desist order against plaintiff, pending further ruling from the court on the preliminary injunction issue, including the issue of an appropriate bond; the plaintiff is enjoined from adding new Nebraska clients pending resolution of the preliminary injunction issue as ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (SED)

Download PDF
-TDT Young v. Heineman et al Doc. 37 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA LESLIE RAE YOUNG, Plaintiff, v. DAVE HEINEMAN, JON BRUNING, Governor of the State of Nebraska, in his official capacity, JOHN A. GALE, Secretary of State & Chairperson of the Nebraska Real Estate Commission and GREG LEMON, Director of the Nebraska Real Estate Commission, in their official capacities, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 4:10CV3147 SECOND AMENDED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER This matter is before the court on the defendants' motion to clarify, Filing No. 35. The court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The defendants' motion to clarify (Filing No. 35) is granted. The defendants are restrained from taking any further action to enforce Nebraska Revised Statute § 81-885.03 against plaintiff Leslie Rae Young or the July 20, 2010, Cease and Desist Order against plaintiff Leslie Rae Young, pending further ruling from the court on the preliminary injunction issue, including the issue of an appropriate bond. 2. 3. The plaintiff is enjoined from adding new Nebraska clients pending resolution of the preliminary injunction issue. DATED this 6th day of August, 2010. BY THE COURT: s/ Joseph F. Bataillon Chief United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?