Stejskal v. Lundstrom

Filing 60

ORDER - IT IS ORDERED The pending motion for preliminary approval of class settlement is denied as moot. The parties shall file a revised motion for preliminary approval of class settlement within 10 days from the date of this order. Member Cases: 8:10-cv-00199-JFB-TDT, 4:10-cv-03177-JFB-TDT, 8:10-cv-00332-JFB-TDTOrdered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (TCL )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
DAVID G. RAY, Individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated; GABRIEL
D'SOUZA, VALENTINO GROUP,

8:10CV199

Plaintiffs,
ORDER
v.
GILBERT G. LUNDSTROM, MICHAEL J.
FALBO, TIERONE CORPORATION,
EUGENE B. WITKOWICZ, CHARLES W.
HOSKINS, JAMES A. LAPHEN,
Defendants.
________________________
DOUGLAS L. STEJSKAL,
4:10CV3177
Plaintiff,
v.
GILBERT G. LUNDSTROM,
Defendant.
__________________________
DOUGLAS L. STEJSKAL,
8:10CV332

Plaintiff,
v.
JAMES A. LAPHEN,
Defendant.

This matter is before the court on its own motion. These are consolidated cases
for violations of federal securities laws. The court is in receipt of a letter request that the
court forego consideration of the pending unopposed motion for preliminary approval of
a class settlement (Filing No. 97) for 10 days. In the letter, counsel for defendant
Hoskins represents that the parties anticipate filing a revised motion by the end of the
week. The court construes the letter as an indication that the parties withdraw the
pending motion. Accordingly,
1

IT IS ORDERED
1.

The pending motion for preliminary approval of class settlement is denied

as moot.
2.

The parties shall file a revised motion for preliminary approval of class

settlement within 10 days from the date of this order.
DATED this 16th day of May, 2012.

BY THE COURT:
s/ Joseph F. Bataillon
United States District Judge

2