Erbert v. Konecranes Standard Lifting Corp. et al
Filing
98
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER after conferring with the parties, The courts previous progression order, (Filing No. 46 ), is set aside, and all deadlines and hearings therein are cancelled. At this time, the parties discovery efforts will be focused on preparing for additional mediation. The discovery needed for full participation in mediation shall be completed by March 31, 2013. A telephonic conference with the undersigned magistrate judge will be held on May 30, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. to discuss the status of the parties settlement discussions. Counsel for plaintiff shall place the call. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (MKR)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
HEATH ERBERT, TOPP'S
MECHANICAL, INC., a domestic
corporation;
4:10CV3196
Plaintiffs,
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
vs.
KONECRANES STANDARD LIFTING
CORP., a foreign corporation; MORRIS
MATERIAL HANDLING, INC., a foreign
corporation; KONECRANES, INC., a
foreign corporation; BLACK AND
VEATCH CONSTRUCTION, INC., a
foreign corporation; CASEY
INDUSTRIAL, INC., a foreign corporation;
and TOPP'S MECHANICAL, INC., a
domestic corporation;
Defendants.
After conferring with the parties,
IT IS ORDERED:
1)
The court’s previous progression order, (Filing No. 46), is set aside, and all
deadlines and hearings therein are cancelled.
2)
At this time, the parties’ discovery efforts will be focused on preparing for
additional mediation. The discovery needed for full participation in
mediation shall be completed by March 31, 2013.
3)
A telephonic conference with the undersigned magistrate judge will be held
on May 30, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. to discuss the status of the parties’ settlement
discussions. Counsel for plaintiff shall place the call.
October 23, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Cheryl R. Zwart
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?